PATNA HIGH COURT
S.N.P.Singh and Kanhaiyaji JJ.
Baikunth Nath Upadhyaya
Versus
State Of Bihar
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2035 of 1970 ;
Decided On : OCTOBER 08, 1971
BIHAR AND ORISSA MUNICIPAL ACT, 1922 - NOTIFICATION - CHALLENGE - VALIDITY - CONSULTATION WITH PANCHAYAT SAMITI - ALTERATION OF LOCAL LIMITS OF GRAM PANCHAYAT - ASCERTAINMENT OF VIEWS OF PEOPLE - INCLUSION OF AREA IN NOTIFIED AREA - POWER OF STATE GOVERNMENT.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, Pramukh of Namkun Panchayat Samiti, challenged the validity of a notification issued by the Bihar Government including certain villages in the Doranda Notified Area. The petitioner argued that the notification was invalid as the Panchayat Samiti was not consulted before the villages were excluded from the Block and included in the Notified Area, that there was a contravention of the provisions of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1947, and that the State Government had no power to include any area in the Notified Area already constituted.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the notification was not invalid on the ground that the State Government did not consult the Namkum Panchayat Samiti before issuing the same, as the provisions of the Bihar Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads Act, 1962, were not attracted when an area had been constituted a Municipality or a Notified Area under the provisions of the Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922. The court also held that there was no contravention of the provisions of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1947, as the Government had not issued any notification excluding any village or part of a village from any Gram Panchayat, thereby making an alteration in the local limits of the jurisdiction of that Gram Panchayat. The court further held that the State Government had the power to include an area in a notified area already constituted under Sub-section (1) of Sec.388 of the Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922.
Issues: 1. Whether the State Government was required to consult the Panchayat Samiti before excluding any area from a Block for the purposes of the Bihar Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads Act, 1962? 2. Whether there was a contravention of the provisions of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1947, by the State Government? 3. Whether the State Government had the power to include any area in the Notified Area already constituted under the Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the State Government was not required to consult the Panchayat Samiti before excluding any area from a Block for the purposes of the Bihar Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads Act, 1962, as the provisions of the Act were not attracted when an area had been constituted a Municipality or a Notified Area under the provisions of the Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922. 2. The court held that there was no contravention of the provisions of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1947, by the State Government as the Government had not issued any notification excluding any village or part of a village from any Gram Panchayat, thereby making an alteration in the local limits of the jurisdiction of that Gram Panchayat. 3. The court held that the State Government had the power to include an area in a notified area already constituted under Sub-section (1) of Sec.388 of the Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922, as the provision gave wide power to the State Government to make administrative provisions for all or any of the purposes of the Act in any area specified in the notification.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition challenging the validity of the notification.
S.N.P.Singh, J.
1. The petitioner is the Pramukh of Namkun (Khijri) Pan-chayat Samiti is the district of Ranchi. He has filed this writ application for quashing Notification No. 8220 L. S. G., dated the 27th of November, 1970, purported to have been issued by the Government of Bihar under Clause (c) of Sec. 6 of the Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922. A copy of the said notification has been made Annesure 1 to the writ application. By the impugned notification a number of villages either in whole or in part have been included within the Doranda Notified Area.
2. As stated in the writ application, Namkum Panchayat Samiti consists of twenty Gram Panchayats which were constituted by various notifications of the Bihar Government in or about the year 1950. All the twenty Gram Panchayats were brought under the jurisdiction of the Namkum Block Samiti in the year 1964 when the Bihar Panchayat Samitis and Zila Pari-shads Act, 1961 hereinafter to be called "Bihar Act 6 of 1962", came into force in the district of Banchi. It is said that on the 16th of January, 1964, the first Panchayat Samiti of Namkum Block was elected and after the expiry of its term the election of office bearers of the said Samiti was held in June 1967 in which the petitioner was elected the Pramukh. As provided under Sec. 5 of Bihar Act 6 of 1962, the Panchayat Samiti consists of the Mukhiyas of all the twenty Gram Panchayats, the representatives of Co-operative Societies and other institutions and certain individuals.
The petitioner, in the capacity of the Pramukh of Namkum Panchayat Samiti, has challenged the validity of the notification mainly on the ground that the Panchayat Samiti was not consulted before the villages in whole or in part were excluded from the Block and were included in the Notified Area. The validity of the notification has further been challenged on the ground that there has been contravention of the provisions of Sec.3 (3) of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1947, hereinafter to be called "Bihar Act 7 of 1948", because the State Government altered the local limits of the jurisdiction of the various Gram Panchayats by excluding villages or parts of the villages without ascertaining the views of the people of the area affected by such alteration. In course of his argument, Mr. Thakur Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, raised another contention relating to the validity of the notification. He submitted that the State Government has no power to include any area to the Notified Area already constituted under Sec.388 of the Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922.
3. I will first deal with the main ground on which the validity of the notification has been challenged. Chapter II of Bihar Act 6 of 1962 provides for constitution, incorporation, composition etc. of the Fanchayat Samitis. Under Sec.3 (1) of that Act the State Government has been empowered (a) to declare any area within a particular district to be a Block and name the Block, (b) to include any area within the same district in a Block so declared, (c) to exclude any area from any such Block, or (d) to transfer any area from one Block to another within the same district. By Bihar Act 4 of 1964 a proviso has been added to Sec.3 (1) which reads as under:
"Provided that before issuing any notification under Clause (b), (c) or (d), the State Government shall consult the concerned Panchayat Samiti and Zila Parishad, if any, and where no Panchayat Samiti for any Block or Zila Parishad for the district has been constituted, the concerned Block Development Committee and the District Development Committee, if any, constituted under the orders of the State Government."
Mr. Thakur Prasad submitted that before excluding any area from a Block it is incumbent on the State Government to consult the Panchayat Samiti of the Block concerned. As in the instant case the State Government did not consult the Namkum Panchayat Samiti before excluding various villages either in whole or in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.