SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Pat) 15

N.L.UNTWALIA, S.SARWAR ALI
Narendra Kumar Ghose – Appellant
Versus
Sheodeni Ram – Respondent


Judgment

Untwalia, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 4-5-68 of the Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar, passed in case No. 28 of 1968 in a case under the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Areas and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1962, hereinafter called the Act, the petitioners have obtained a rule from this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India against the respondents to show cause why the order aforesaid be not called up and quashed and why an appropriate order be not made. Cause has been shown by respondent No. 1 who alone is interested in the matter.

2. The petitioners case is that Narendra Kumar Ghose, petitioner No. 1, is a raiyat in village Phulwaria Tajpur, police station Pipra in the District of Champaran. Parasnath Sinha, petitioner No. 2, is claimed to be a friend of petitioner No. 1. The latters case is that he purchased for a sum of Rs. 6,000.00 14 kathas, 5 dhurs of land comprised in plot No. 2261, khata No. 152 in village Phulwaria Tajpur. He claims further that he is an adjacent raiyat of the plot purchased by him holding land on its boundary on three sides, i.e., North, East and West. In order to save the land from a

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top