SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Pat) 34

SHIVESHWAR PRASAD SINHA, SHAMBHU PRASAD SINGH
Andhi Kuer – Appellant
Versus
Rajeshwar Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Shambhu Prasad Singh, J.

1. This appeal is by the plaintiffs and the cross-objection is by defendant No. 1.Having heard the parties and considered the pros and cons of the matters, in my opinion, neither of them have any merit and consequently both have to be dismissed for the reasons which I am presently giving.

2. In order to appreciate the controversy between the parties, it would be relevant to give a short genealogy:

Matar Singh

|

--------------------------------------

| |

Dhanraj Singh-Mostt. Barti Kuer (D.8) Lachhman Singh

|

--------------------------------------------- Jagu Singh

| | | |

Dular Singh (died Smt. Andhi Kuer Smt. Shampati |

during the life (Plff.1) Kuer (Plff.2).|

time of his father) |

Mt. Phoola Kuer (D.4). ------------------------

| |

Ayodhya Singh Rajeshwar Singh(

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top