SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Pat) 66

AKBAR HUSAIN, N.L.UNTWALIA
Samachar Bharti – Appellant
Versus
Kedar Nath – Respondent


Judgment

N.L.Untwalia, J.

1. Samachar Bharti, a news agency, having its registered office in New Delhi, is the sole petitioner in this writ application. Shri Kedar Nath, respondent No. 1, is a working journalist within the meaning of Clause (f) of Sec.2 of the Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 (Central Act XLV of 1955), hereinafter called the Working Journalists Act. At the relevant time he was working in the employment of the petitioner as a working journalist at Patna. He was discharged from service, whereupon he filed a complaint before the Presiding Officer of Labour Court, Patna, under Section 26 (2) of the Bihar Shops and Establishments Act, 1953 (Bihar Act 8 of 1954), hereinafter called the Bihar Act. A complaint was filed, complaining about the discharge order dated the 1st of August 1967; a copy of the complaint petition is Annexure 1 to the writ application. Respondent No. 2, said to be the General Manager of Samachar Bharti, was implead-ed as opposite party No. 1 and Samachar Bharti as opposite party No. 2 in the petition (Annexure 1). In response to the notice served on the petitioner it appeared and filed a preliminary ob











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top