1. These two civil revisions between the same parties have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.

2. The decree-holders are opposite parties in both the Civil Revision applications. In two money suits, they had obtained two money decrees against the husband of the petitioner. The decrees were of substantial amounts of several lakhs of rupees. Both the decrees were put in execution in two different execution cases. Both the execution cases were earlier dismissed for default. Thereafter, in the year 1962, two fresh execution cases were filed being Execution Cases Nos. 120 and 121 of 1962. At some stage of the execution proceedings, the husband of the petitioner died and the petitioner was substituted as a legal representative of the judgment-debtor. On the 30th January, 1964. she filed an objection that most of the properties were her personal properties and were not liable for payment of the decretal dues against her husband. Two miscellaneous cases started under Sec. 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure were allowed, and rnotl of the properties were released from attachment. Tt appears that some properties were in possession of a receiver and a dis