SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Pat) 151

MUNESHWARI SAHAY, B.D.SINGH
Bhupat Kumhar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Muneshwari Sahay, J.

1. All the twelve appellants have been convicted under Sec.302 read with Sec.149 of the Indian Penal Code and have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life. They have further been convicted under Sec.325 read with Sec.149 of the Indian Penal Code, but no separate sentence has been passed against them under the section. Three of the appellants, namely, appellants Sanat Mahton, Budhan Kumhar and Babulal Kumhar have been further convicted under Sec.148 of the Indian Penal Code whereas the remaining appellants have been convicted under Sec.147 of the Indian Penal Code. No separate sentence, however, has been passed against the appellants under these sections.

2. The appellants are all residents of village Jogia Tola within Jainagar Pohce station of Hazaribagh district. Most of the appellants are related to one another. Appellants 3 and 6 are brothers and appellants 4 and 5 are their sons respectively. Appellant No. 1 is the nephew of appellant No. 6 and appellants Nos. 11 and 12 are his cousins. Appellant No. 2 is the son of appellant No. 12 and appellant No. 8 is the son of appellant No. 11. Appellants 7, 9 and 10 do not seem to be related






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top