S.K.JHA, N.L.UNTWALIA, K.B.N.SINGH
Ram Nandan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Maya Devi – Respondent
UNTWALIA, J.
1. These two Civil Revision Applications, in the first instance, came up for hearing before a learned Single Judge of this Court. He referred them for disposal by a Division Bench. When they were placed before two of us for hearing, we doubted the correctness of the Division Bench decision of this Court in Sashadhar Das V/s. Harihar Prasad (AIR 1973 Pat 361) and desired constitution of a larger Bench for disposal of these two civil revision applications. Since the points involved in the two cases are common and identical, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this Judgment.
2. Civil Revision No. 856 of 1971 filed by the tenant-defendant proceeded to hearing ex parte as the plaintiffs-landlords-opposite party did not appear to contest it. The plaintiffs filed a suit on the 1st August, 1970 for eviction of the defendants out of whom the main contesting defendant is the petitioner. During the pendency of the suit, the plaintiffs filed an application on the 22nd May, 1971, under Sec.11-A of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the Bihar Act) for a direction to the defendants to deposit arrears of rent
Akhauri Mukhteshwar Pd. Sinha V/s. Smt. Urmila Saran
Managing Committee V/s. Tripurary Charan Palit
Sashadhar Das V/s. Harihar Prasad
C. F. Rai Brij Raj Krishna V/s. S. K. Shaw And Brothers
Hansraj Gupta V/s. Official Liquidator Of Dehra Dun Etc. Company
M. Pentiah V/s. Muddala Veeramallappa
Management Of The S. B. I., Hyderabad V/s. Vasudeva Anand
Nityanand M. Joshi V/s. The Life Insurance Corporation Of India
Town Municipal Council, Athani V/s. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Hubli
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.