SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Pat) 176

S.K.JHA, N.L.UNTWALIA, K.B.N.SINGH
Ram Nandan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Maya Devi – Respondent


Judgment

UNTWALIA, J.

1. These two Civil Revision Applications, in the first instance, came up for hearing before a learned Single Judge of this Court. He referred them for disposal by a Division Bench. When they were placed before two of us for hearing, we doubted the correctness of the Division Bench decision of this Court in Sashadhar Das V/s. Harihar Prasad (AIR 1973 Pat 361) and desired constitution of a larger Bench for disposal of these two civil revision applications. Since the points involved in the two cases are common and identical, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this Judgment.

2. Civil Revision No. 856 of 1971 filed by the tenant-defendant proceeded to hearing ex parte as the plaintiffs-landlords-opposite party did not appear to contest it. The plaintiffs filed a suit on the 1st August, 1970 for eviction of the defendants out of whom the main contesting defendant is the petitioner. During the pendency of the suit, the plaintiffs filed an application on the 22nd May, 1971, under Sec.11-A of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the Bihar Act) for a direction to the defendants to deposit arrears of rent
















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top