SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Pat) 55

S.ALI AHMAD, NAGENDRA PRASAD SINGH
Suleman Mian – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

NAGENDRA PRASAD SINGH, J.

1. These four revision applications have been filed by the accused-petitioners who have been convicted u/s. 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act). So far as the petitioners in Criminal Revision No. 354 of 1971 and 1395 of 1972 are convicted u/s 16(1)(b) of the Act. The petitioner in Criminal Revision No. 354 of 1971 has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months, and the petitioner in Criminal Revision No. 1395 of 1972 has been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-, or, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for one month more. The petitioners in Criminal Revision No. 2270 of 1971 and 540 of 1971 have been convicted under Sec.16(1)(a) of the Act. The petitioner in Criminal Revision No. 2270 of 1971 has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, or, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months more. The petitioner in Criminal Revision No. 540 of 1971 has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months and to pay a fine of Rs. 1.000, or, in default



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top