SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Pat) 60

LALIT MOHAN SHARMA
Ram Shankar Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Gopal Prasad Singh – Respondent


Judgment

1. The opposite party filed an application under the provisions of the Indian Succession Act for grant of a probate which was dismissed for default. An application for restoration of the same was filed under Order 9, Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure which was also dismissed for default. Thereafter an application under Order 47, Rule 1 and Sec.151 of the Code of Civil Procedure was filed for restoration of the restoration application. The Court below allowed the last mentioned application and the opposite party in the Court below has filed the present civil revision application.

2. It is stated in paragraphs 8 and 10 of the civil revision application that the learned Subordinate Judge allowed the application under Order 47, Rule 1 and Sec.151 of the Code of Civil Procedure without giving any notice to the petitioner. This fact has not been controverted before me. The learned Subordinate Judge clearly was in error in allowing the application without affording an opportunity to the petitioner in the matter. The application, therefore, is allowed and the order passed by the Court below is set aside. The matter is sent to the Court below for reconsideration on merits after

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top