UDAY SINHA
Halimuddin Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Ashoka Cement Ltd. – Respondent
1. This application in revision is directed against the order of the learned Sessions Judge, Patna dated the 30.08.1972 by which he directed further inquiry into the complaint filed by Ashoka Cement Ltd., opposite party.
2. The facts, in short, are that the general elections for the Bihar Legislative Assembly were to be held in February, 1967. The petitioner was a candidate for election to the Legislative Assembly. The petitioner being on cordial terms with the Company known as Ashoka Cement Ltd., Dalmianagar requested the latter to lend a jeep for electioneering purposes. The opposite party purchased a jeep bearing No. BRP 6446. It was registered in the name of one Pratap Singh, who was an employee of the Company and the Jeep was thereafter delivered to the petitioner along with the services of a driver. At the time of taking delivery of the Jeep from the complainant Company, the petitioner was accompanied by a friend of his named Tajammul Hussain. The Jeep was delivered to the petitioner on 16-1-1967 at Patna. For obvious reasons the petitioner did not grant a receipt in token of having received the jeep, but it was granted by Tajammul Hussain at the instance of and in th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.