SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Pat) 22

LALIT MOHAN SHARMA, BIRENDRA PRASAD SINHA
Munshi Singh – Appellant
Versus
Babulal Singh – Respondent


Judgment

LALIT MOHAN SHARMA, J.

1. This second appeal by the plaintiffs arises out of a suit filed for declaration of title and recovery of possession of 11 bighas 9 kathas and 7 dhurs of land of Jamabandi No. 16 and 1 bigha 14 kathas and 18 dhurs of land of Jamabandi No. 17 of village Amjora in Santhal Parganas.

2. According to the plaintiffs case in brief, Bhuto Singh left behind two sons Meghu Singh and Rito Singh. Rito Singh had a son Nanhku and a daughter Srimati Madhia Devi, Plaintiff No. 1, Munshi Singh, is the son of Nanhku Singh. Mostt. Madhia was married to Beni Singh who had two issues- a son Basuki and a daughter Mossamat Semri. Mossamat Semri was married to Bisho and had a daughter Radhia. Plaintiffs Nos. 2 and 3 are said to be the sons of Radhia. Meghu had a son named Suba whose son was Masudan. Defendant No. 1 Babulal and defendant No. 2 Jagdish Singh are the sons of Masudan. Defendants 3 to 6 are the sons of Babulal and defendant 7 and 8 are the sons of Jagdish. According to the further case of the plaintiff, the lands of Jamabandi No. 17 belonged to Nanhku who gave them to Mossamat Madhia. The land was recorded in the name of Basuki Singh. Basuki Singh also had othe














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top