MOHAN MISRA, GOVIND MOHAN MISRA, S.SARWAR ALI
Krishna Gyanoday Sugar Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Government Of India – Respondent
1. In this Writ application the petitioner, prays for quashing of Annexures 1 to 4. By Annexure 1 the petitioner was directed to submit afresh A. R. I.21 in relation to the Sugar produced by the petitioner-company. It may be stated that A. R. I.21 is one of the forms which has to be submitted by a manufacturer in order to facilitate the levy of proper excise duty. In Annexure 2 it was stated that 1960 quintals of sugar relating to 1966-67 and prior periods, but reproduced during 1967-68 was leviable to excise duty at a rate prevalent in those years and not in the year 1967-68. But this Annexure, the petitioner was required to deposit the differential basic duty amounting to Rs.16,366. It may be stated that this Annexure is a letter addressed by the Sub-Inspector of Central Excise Range, Mirganj, to the Works Manager of the petitioner-company. The petitioner filed an appeal against annexure 2 which has been disposed of under annexure 3, and it has been held by the Collector of Excise that the demand made by the Sub- Inspector of Central Excise is correct. The petitioner, thereafter, went in revision before the Central Government. A copy of the. order of the Central Governmen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.