SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Pat) 218

MADAN MOHAN PRASAD
Awadh Bihari Sharan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Judgment

Madan Mohan Prasai, J.

1. These two applications have been heared together in pursuance of an order to that effect and in view of the questions arising therein being common. They are directed against two similar orders passed by the court below by which it has returned the plaint of two suits to be filed in a proper court on the ground that they were beyond the jurisdiction of that Court.

2. It is necessary to state that river Ghaghra and Ganga intervene some parts of the territories of the States of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. The midstream is taken to be the boundary between the two States. It has on account of the inherent changing nature of the boundary line, to be determined from year to year. On a court of the process of alluvion and diluvion the territories either became or cease to be the territories of one or the other State. In order to remove this constant difficulty came to be passed the Bihar and Uttar Pradesh (Alteration of Boundaries) Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The provisions of this Aact enabled fixation of permanent boundaries between the two States by fixing pillars in the river and not leaving the midstream boundary to be determined from














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top