SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Pat) 216

HARI LAL AGRAWAL
Bibi Asma Shah – Appellant
Versus
Snresh Prasad – Respondent


Judgment

Hari Lal Agrawal, J.

1. The sole question that falls for decision in this case is as to whether the trial Court committed any error of jurisdiction in allowing addition of the heirs and legal representatives of one Syed Hussain ahmad the sole defendant, against whom the title suit in question was instituted, who as transpired later on, was already dead on the date of the institution of the suit, i. e. on 25.11.1969.

2. It appears that the plaintiff on becoming aware of the fact of the death of the said defendant, made an application on 5.6.1970 for expunging his name and adding his heirs and legal representatives, namely, the petitioner (a daughter), his widow and a son. It is not disputed that on that date, i. e. , 5.6.1970, the cause of action for the suit in question against the added legal representatives of the deceased of the original defendant was not barred by limitation.

3. Much thereafter, an application was filed on 6.1.1977, on behalf of the defendants that the original suit having been instituted against a dead person, the suit was a nullity and the order of substitution passed by the court was with-out jurisdiction. The learned Munsif has overruled the objecti





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top