SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Pat) 190

S.K.CHOUDHURI
Ajoy Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. This revision by the plaintiff is directed against the order dated 8-3-1973, passed by the Munsif of Bettiah in title suit No. 81 of 1972 impleading the intervenor as party defendant No. 5 in the suit.

2. The suit was filed for declaration that the lands described in the schedule of the plaint were kaimi lands of the petitioner and that opposite parties Nos. 1 to 3 defendants 1 to 3 (defendants 1st party) had no right to settle the suit land with opposite party No. 4 (defendant No. 4 - defendant 2nd party) and as such the said settlement in favour of defendant No. 4 is illegal and void and has not conveyed any right, title and interest in the suit lands.

3. The plaintiffs case in short was that he is the raiyat of village Manguraha and is in possession of the suit land since the last 30 to 32 years and ultimately those lands were settled with him by the circle officer in case No. 13 of 1961-62 after due enquiry and rent was fixed in his name. The further allegation was that defendant No. 4 filed an application for fixation of rent with regard to the suit lands which was registered as rent fixation case No. 148 of 1963 but the same was dismissed for default on 20-4-1965.




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top