SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Pat) 77

PATNA HIGH COURT
K.B.N.Singh, L.M.Sharma and . JJ.
Sumangali Kumari
Versus
State Of Bihar
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 107 of 1977 ;
Decided On : APRIL 22, 1977

The right to file an appeal against an order under section 15 (3) of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961 did not disappear after the deletion of sub-section (3) of section 15 by Bihar Ordinance No.219 of 1976.

Headnote:

LAND REFORMS - FIXATION OF CEILING AREA AND ACQUISITION OF SURPLUS LAND - APPEAL - RIGHT TO FILE - DELETION OF SECTION 15 (3) OF THE BIHAR LAND REFORMS (FIXATION OF CEILING AREA AND ACQUISITION OF SURPLUS LAND) ACT, 1961 - EFFECT - WHETHER RIGHT TO FILE AN APPEAL AGAINST AN ORDER UNDER SECTION 15 (3) OF THE ACT ALSO DISAPPEARED - HELD, NO.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed an objection under section 15 (3) of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961 (the Act), claiming that 27 acres out of the lands declared to be surplus belonged to her as the same had been gifted to her by a deed of gift dated the 19th June, 1935. The Additional Collector rejected the objection, and the petitioner filed an appeal before the Deputy Commissioner. In the meantime, Bihar Ordinance No.219 of 1976 deleted sub-section (3) of section 15 of the Act, taking away the right to file a claim petition within thirty days of the publication of the notification for acquisition of surplus land. The Deputy Commissioner dismissed the appeal as not maintainable.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the right to file an appeal against an order under section 15 (3) of the Act did not disappear after the deletion of sub-section (3) of section 15 by Bihar Ordinance No.219 of 1976. The court reasoned that the deletion of sub-section (3) was prospective, not retrospective, and that the right to file a claim petition was a vested right that did not get obliterated merely because of the subsequent deletion of section 15 (3) of the Act.

Issues: Whether the right to file an appeal against an order under section 15 (3) of the Act disappeared after the deletion of sub-section (3) of section 15 by Bihar Ordinance No.219 of 1976.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the following principles in reaching its decision: * The right to file an appeal from a final order passed by an officer below the rank of the Collector of the district while discharging the functions of a Collector under the Act is a statutory right conferred by section 30 of the Act. * The deletion of sub-section (3) of section 15 of the Act by Bihar Ordinance No.219 of 1976 was prospective, not retrospective. * The right to file a claim petition under section 15 (3) of the Act is a vested right that does not get obliterated merely because of the subsequent deletion of section 15 (3) of the Act.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the order of the Deputy Commissioner dismissing the appeal as not maintainable, and remitted the case to the Deputy Commissioner for disposal of the appeal in accordance with law.

Judgment

K. B. N. Singh, L. M. Sharma, J.

1. In this writ petition the petitioner prays for quashing of an order dated the 14th October, 1976 of the additional Collector, Hazaribagh, rejecting her objection filed under section 15 (3)of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of surplus Land) Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), a copy of which has been filed as Annexure 1, as also the order of the Deputy Commissioner, hazaribagh, dated the 30th November, 1976 (Annexure 2), dismissing her appeal from the order contained in Annexure 1 as not maintainable.

2. Land Ceiling Case No.163 of 1973-74 was initiated against Deonarain singh, brother of the petitioner. In that proceeding the lands mentioned in Annexure 3 to the writ petition were declared to be surplus lands of Deonarain singh. The petitioner, who claimed to be an illiterate pardanashin lady having no notice of the case, filed an objection under section 15 (3) of the Act, alleging that 27 acres out of the lands declared to be surplus belonged to her as the same had been gifted to her by a deed of gift dated the 19th June, 1935 and since then she was in possession thereof, and in proof of which she has other relevant documents also. In view of this order that we propose to pass in this case, it is not necessary to give the details of the claim of the petitioner. The petitioners objection was rejected by the Additional Collector by his order dated the 14th October, 1976, against which, as mentioned above, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh. In the meantime, by virtue of clause 3 of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) (Amendment) Ordinance, 1976 (Bihar Ordinance No.219 of 1976 ). published in the Bihar Gazette extraordinary, dated the 2nd November, 1976, sub-section (5) of section 15 of the original Act stood deleted, and this amendment came into effect from the date of publication of the Ordinance in the Bihar Gazette, i. e.2nd November, 1976. The effect of this amendment is that on the publication of the notification under sub-section (1) of section 15 for acquisition of surplus land of a landholder, the right conferred on a person to file claim petition, claiming interest in the land specified in the notification, within thirty days of such publication, was taken away.

3. The short and important question that falls for consideration in the instant case is whether after deletion of the original sub-section (3) of section 15 of the Act by Bihar Ordinance No.219 of 1976, the petitioners right to file an appeal against an order under section 15 (3) of the Act also disappeared or not. Sec.30 of the Act which deals with appeals, reads as follows, after the amendment made by Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and acquisition of Surplus Land) (Amendment) Act, 1976 (Bihar Act 22 of 1976) :

" (1) An appeal from any final order passed by any officer below the rank of the Collector of the district while discharging the functions of a collector under this Act shall lie to the Collector of the district or any other officer specially authorised in this behalf by the State government within thirty days of such an order ;

" (2) An appeal from any final order passed by the Collector of the district shall lie to the Board of Revenue within thirty days of such order ; and

" (3) An appeal under this section shall be heard and disposed of in the prescribed manner. " this amending Bihar Act 22 of 1976 was published in the Bihar Gazette a day earlier than Bihar Ordinance No.219 of 1976, i. e. on the lst November, 1976. From the above provisions it is apparent that there is a right of appeal from any final order passed by any officer below the rank of the Collector of the district while discharging the functions of a Collector under this Act to the Collector of the district or to any other officer specially authorised in this behalf by the State Government. There cannot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top