SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Pat) 9

LALIT MOHAN SHARMA
Mt. Rulia Devi – Appellant
Versus
Raghunath Prasad – Respondent


Judgment

1. This appeal by the appellants arises out of a suit filed by the plaintiff for a mortgage decree for a sum of Rs. 11,478 with pendente lite and future interest. The plaintiff Raghunath Prasad and the defendant No. 1 Ram Chandra Prasad are brothers. By a registered partition deed dated 2-4-1950 there was a final partition between them. There were certain transactions between the parties, the details whereof are not necessary to state here in view, of the scope of the present appeal at this stage and the arguments. Ultimately, the defendant No. 1 as the karta of his family executed a mortgage document (Ext. 2) in respect of a house in Sitamarhi town for a sum of Rs. 6,500 on 5-12-1951. A sum of Rs. 4,250 was received by him in cash and there was an adjustment of the balance amount. The plaintiff claimed to be a registered money lender and filed the suit for realisation of the dues under Ext. 2. The account mentioned at the bottom of the plaint indicate that besides the principal amount of Rs 6,500, interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum was Vaimed from date of execution till the date of the filing of the suit. The other defendants impleaded in the suit were sons and a




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top