SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Pat) 194

S.SHAMSUL HASAN
Kailas Tewari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

S. S. Hasan, J.

1. The petitioner in this application is being proceeded against for having committed an offence under Sec.211 of the Indian Penal Code and Rule 43 of the Defence of India Rules. It is said that the petitioner had filed a complaint in the Court of Learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, bhabhua on 13.3.1976 under Sec.342 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was examined on 19.3.1976 on solemn affirmation and though the witnesses were present, they were not examined. It appears that the complaint petition was dismissed by a considered order passed by the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bhabhua, dated 15.4.1976 and by that very order the court directed the petitioner to show cause as to why he should not be prosecuted under Sec.211 of the Indian Penal Code and Rule 43 of the defence of India Rules. The cause was shown by the petitioner which was rejected and by his order dated 21.4.1976 the Learned Sub-divisional Judical magistrate directed that a complaint be filed under Sec.211 of the Indian penal Code and Rule 43 of the Defence of India Rules. The facts need not be stated because I propose to dispose of this application on a short poin.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top