S. P. Sinha, B. S. Sinha, JJ.

1. The petitioner, who on being appointed as a Cade Sub-Inspector of Police, was directed to join the Police training College under the charge of Deputy Inspector-General of Police (Training) cum-Principal, Hazaribagh, Respondent no.4. During the course of his training, the petitioner received the order contained in Annexure 1 by which he has been removed from Service as Cadet Sub-Inspector of Police. He preferred an appeal against the said removal to the Inspector-General of police Bihar, Patna, Respondent No.2, but the same was rejected and so also his further appeal to the State Government, Respondent No.1, The orders passed by the respective authorities are contained in Annexure 1, 2 and 3. By this application the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the orders contained in these Annexures, viz. , 1, 2 and.

2. The petitioner is said to have been absent for forty-four days from his training without taking permission for doing So. Besides, the petitioner is said to be not fit for the responsibility of a member of the Police department. According to the petitioner, however, his absence was not unauthorised and he has tried to explain in his p