BIRENDRA PRASAD SINHA, UDAY SINHA, S.SARWAR ALI
Ramkrit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
SARWAR ALI, J.
1. In this writ application petitioners challenge the vires of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 (the Act). But before dealing with the contentions raised, I may state the relevant facts leading to the filing of this writ application. I would also indicate the relevant statutory provisions. The facts :-
2. The petitioners filed Title Suit No. 103 of 1966. The suit was pending in the court of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Muzaffarpur, when the impugned order contained in Annexure-5 was passed. In the suit the petitioners-plaintiffs alleged that certain alienations made by defendant 1st party in favour of defendant second party were not binding on the plaintiffs. It was therefore, prayed that the said alienations be set aside and the plaintiffs be put in possession of the properties mentioned in Schedule I to the plaint. The properties in the suit are situate in several villages. In all these villages according to the finding of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, consolidation proceedings are going on. An application was filed on behalf of the defendants stating that consolidation operation had commenced in
Attorney General V/s. Earnest Augustus (Prince) Of Hanover
Basti Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. V/s. State Of U.P.
Gorakh Nath V/s. Hari Narain Singh
Kangshari Halder V/s. State Of West Bengal
Lachhman Dass V/s. State Of Punjab
Magan Lal Chhaggan Lal (P) Ltd. V/s. Municipal Corporation Of Greater Bombay
Mukhtar Singh V/s. State Of U.P.
Ram Chandra Palai V/s. State Of Orissa
State Of Bombay V/s. F.N. Balsara
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.