HARI LAL AGRAWAL
Rohan Lal Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
Prem Prakash Gupta – Respondent
1. This application by the defendant is directed against an order of the Munsiff granting leave to the plaintiff to file additional pleading in the following circumstances.
2. The plaintiff opposite party filed a title suit in the Court of the Munsif, Patna City, for realisation of arrears of rent and eviction of the petitioner from the premises in suit. Admittedly the premises in suit originally belonged to one Shrimati Shanti Devi who had inducted the petitioner in the same. The plaintiff purchased the house on 16-12-1974. In the written statement the defendant took several pleas and denied all the allegations made by the plaintiff against him for his eviction. One of his pleas was that he had spent Rs. 1,430.00 towards repair of the house with the consent of the previous landlord, which amount had not yet been adjusted towards the rent and, therefore, he was entitled to receive that amount from the plaintiff.
3. The trial Court allowed the plaintiff to amend his plaint, granting the defendant an opportunity to file additional written statement. The defendant filed his additional written statement accordingly on 21-3-1977. Soon thereafter on 20-4-1977 the Plaintiff filed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.