SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Pat) 141

SHIVESHWAR PRASAD SINHA
Parke Davisand Co. – Appellant
Versus
D. B. T. Pharmaceuticals – Respondent


Judgment

1. This plaintiffs appeal is directed against an order dated 8th December, 1978, refusing to grant temporary injunction in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant

2. The suit, which was in relation to infringement of trade mark right, was for perpetual injunction against the defendant from using the trade mark. The plaintiff also prayed for grant of temporary injunction against the defendant.

The plaintiff is a manufacturer of various types of medicinal products having separate registered trade mark for each type and one which has given rise to the present cause is the alleged use by the defendant of the trade mark DRYL of which the appellant-plaintiff was the registered proprietor having Registration No. 21636 dated 4-7-1963. The defendants are also manufacturers. of medicinal products. The other trade marks of medicinal and pharmaceutical preparations of which the appellant is the registered proprietor are Benadryl, Caladryl, Ambodryl, Ergodryl, Bodryl and Combodryl. By virtue of the registration of the said trade marks, the plaintiff claims sole and execlusive right to its use.

3. It appears that some time in the year 1976, the plaintiff came to learn that the










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top