PATNA HIGH COURT
Birendra Prasad Sinha, J.
Resham Lal Yadav
Versus
State Of Bihar
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 227 of 1980 ;
Decided On : OCTOBER 03, 1980
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE - SECTION 173(8) - SUPPLEMENTARY CHARGE-SHEET - SUBMISSION - CONDITIONS - FURTHER INVESTIGATION AND EVIDENCE REQUIRED.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners were accused of dacoity. The police submitted a charge-sheet against two accused persons and a final report against the petitioners. The first informant filed a protest petition, which was rejected. The case was committed to the Court of Session. The Magistrate directed the police to submit a supplementary charge-sheet against the petitioners, which was challenged by the petitioners.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that a supplementary charge-sheet could not be submitted without further investigation by the police and without obtaining further evidence against the petitioners.
Issues: Whether a supplementary charge-sheet can be submitted without further investigation and evidence.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure allows for further investigation and submission of a supplementary charge-sheet if the police obtains further evidence. In this case, the supplementary charge-sheet was submitted without any further investigation or evidence, and therefore it was not valid.
Final Decision: The court set aside the impugned order dated 27th August 1979 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria.
Birendra Prasad Sinha, J.
1. This application is directed against an order dated 27.08.1979 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in Bhargawa P. S. Case No. 7(8) 74. By this order, the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the offence u/s. 395 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioners on the basis of a supplementary charge-sheet submitted by the police.
2. In the night of 12/13.08.1974, a dacoity is said to have taken place in the house of the first informant Prem Lal Mahto. The information was lodged with the police in which the petitioners were also named as accused. On 14.04.1976, the police submitted charge-sheet against only two persons namely Bindeshwar Mahto and one another. The final report was submitted against the petitioners. The first informant thereupon filed a Protest petition which was rejected by the Court on 8.08.1978. Cognizance was taken against the two charge-sheet accused persons and the case was thereafter committed to the Court of Session. On 28.03.1979, the learned Magistrate directed the police to send a copy of the order of the Superintendent of Police to re-open the case. He, however, observed that as the case has been committed to the Court of Session, the question of re-opening the case did not arise. On 8-5-1979, the learned Magistrate after perusing the order of the Superintendent of Police, directed the police to submit charge-sheet. The charge-sheet was, accordingly, submitted by the police and the impugned order was passed on 27-8-1979.
3. Mr. S. C. Misra learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that after the cognizance had been taken of the offence and the two accused persons had been committed to the Court of Session, the Police had no power to submit a supplementary charge-sheet except on receipt of further evidence oral or documentary.
4. The question for consideration, therefore, is as to whether without any further investigation and without the collection of further evidence, oral or documentary, and supplementary report can be submitted by the police.
5. Sec.173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (the Code for brief) provides for submission of a charge-sheet after the investigation is complete. Section 173(8) of the Code provides that a further investigation in respect of an offence can be made after a report under Sub-section (2) has been forwarded to the Magistrate and if the police obtains further evidence, he may forward a further report regarding such evidence to the Magistrate. Sec.173(8) of the Code reads thus:
(8) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to preclude further investigation in respect of an offence after a report under Sub-section (2) has been forwarded to the Magistrate and, whereupon such investigation, the officer-in-charge of the police station obtains farther evidence, oral or documentary, he shall forward to the Magistrate a further report or reports regarding such evidence in the form prescribed, and the provisions of Sub-sections (2) to (6) shall, as far as may be, apply in relation to such report or reports as they apply in relation to a report forwarded under Sub-section (2)". This is a new provision inserted in the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973. The Police is not precluded from making further investigation in respect of an offence after the submission of a chare-sheet. If upon a further investigation, fresh evidence is available, the police can submit a supplementary charge-sheet. The question is as to whether in the present case the supple mentary charge-sheet was submitted by the police on the basis of any further investigation and further evidence.
6. The letter of the Sub-divisional Officer directing the Officer Incharge of the Police-station to submit a supplementary charge-sheet is on the record. It appears that the D. F. G. of Police looked into the old file and ordered for submission of a supplementary charge-sheet against the remaining F. I. R. accused pe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.