SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Pat) 96

R.P.MANDAL, BIRENDRA PRASAD SINHA
Ram Prabesh Rai – Appellant
Versus
Bishun Mandal – Respondent


Judgment

Birendra Prasad Sinha, J.

1. This case has come to us on a reference made by S. Shamsul Hasan, J. The question for consideration is whether an executive Magistrate can be asked to investigate a complaint under Sec.202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the new Code.)

2. On 21-3-1975 a complaint was filed by opposite party Bishua Mandal in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagaipur. On the next day, the learned Magistrate examined the complainant on solemn affirmation and directed Shri S. Ram, Execute Magistrate, Bhagalpur, to investigate into the allegations. Shri S. Rum, Executive Magistrate, recorded the statement of some witnesses produced by the complainant and submitted a report. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, on 17-6-1976, disagreeing with the said report, took cognizance of the offences under Sections 147, 148, 379 and 427, Indian Penal Code, against the petitioners and transferred the case to the file of Shri R.P. Yadavendu, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, for disposal.

3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the Chief Judicial Magistrate could not direct an investigation to be made by an Executi













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top