SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Pat) 125

S.SARWAR ALI, H.C.AGRAWAL, SHIVANUGRAH NARAIN
Bishundeo Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Sarwar Ali, J.

1. These two writ applications have been referred to the Full Bench to consider the correctness of a Bench decision of the Court in Shri Rajib Ranjan Pathak V/s. State of Bihar (C.W.J.C. 290 of 1969) decided on 28th April, 1970. In this case the Bench interpreted the State Government Circular No. 6509-A dated 12-12-1934 in relation to the determination of seniority of officers in State and Subordinate Services where more than one officer is appointed to the service at the same time. Since by virtue of the notification issued by the State Government (Notification No. 3555-3, 27/50-A dated 15-4-1950) the aforesaid notification of 1934 has the force of rules made under Article 309 of the Constitution of India, I shall refer to the said notification as the 1934 Rules.

2. Both in the State Services as well as in Subordinate services a number of posts are permanent. Temporary posts are also created from time to time which, according to exigency of the services, may be made permanent at a later stage. Appointments to permanent posts are sometimes on substantive basis, and in some cases on probation, officiating or temporary basis. The probationary and officiating ap












































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top