SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Pat) 88

LALIT MOHAN SHARMA, S.ALI AHMAD
Inspecting Assistant Commissioners – Appellant
Versus
Kedar Nath Jhunjhunwala – Respondent


Judgment

S.Ali Ahmad, J.

1. This appeal under Sec.269H of the Income Tax Act was filed on: 6.11.1980 against an order dated 18.8.1980 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal under Sec.269G of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act). According to the Stamp Reporter, the last date of limitation for filing the appeal was 5.11.1980, but since it was filed on 6.11.1980, it was barred by limitation. The office placed the limitation matter for orders,

2. Mr. Rajgarhia, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant, namely, the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (Acquisition), contended that the stamp report was erroneous and that the appeal was filed well within time. Mr. Shreenath Singh, learned Counsel for the respondent, on the other hand, contended that the appeal was barred by limitation and, therefore, it should be dismissed as such. During the course of argument, Mr. Rajgarhia filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying to condone the delay of one day in filing the appeal on the grounds mentioned in that application. Mr. Shreenath Singh opposed this application also. In these circumstances, it is, therefore, necessary to consider as to w






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top