SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Pat) 183

ANAND PRASAD SINHA, NAGENDRA PRASAD SINGH
Tej Bahadur Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

Nagendra Prasad Singh, J.

1. This writ application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for a writ of Mandamus on the respondents to declare to the post of Senior District Prosecutor as equivalent to the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police and to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the cadre of Indian Police Service after inclusion of his name in the select list.

2. The petitioner was appointed on 1.7.1960 by the State Government as a Senior District Prosecutor in the rank and pay scale of Deputy Superintendent of Police under the Police Act, 1961. The petitioner was assigned prosecution work as well as general work of Police. According to the petitioner, although he was designated as Senior District Prosecutor, from time to time he had been assigned work of general police, details whereof have been given in the writ application. In respect of performance of his duties of the general police, superior officers have granted certificates appreciating his merit as a police officer. Copies of entries in the character roll as well as copies of the certificates granted to the petitioner from time to time have been annexed. Before the name of the petition









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top