SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Pat) 170

RAM NANDAN PRASAD, S.SARWAR ALI
Deodhari Sah And Another – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Tirhut Division And Others. – Respondent


Judgment

RAMNANDAN PRASAD, J.

1. The petitioners have filed this writ application under Art.226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing the orders contained in Annexures-1, 2 and 3 of this writ application. Annexure-1 is the order dated 9-1-1978 passed by the House Controller of Motihari purporting to be an order under S.10(4) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease. Rent and Eviction) Control Act 1977 (hereinafter called the Act), whereby he directed the petitioners to complete the repair works at an estimated cost of Rs. 2500.00 in the portion of the building which was let out by them to respondent No. 4 Shanker Prasad Kanaujja within 15 days failing which respondent No. 4 was ordered to complete the said repair works and to recover the costs incurred thereon by adjustment of rent or by any other legal means. Annexure-2 is the order passed by the Collector of East Champaran in the appeal filed by the petitioners against the said order, being Revenue Appeal No. 124/77-78 under the provisions of S.21 of the Act, by which he rejected the appeal and upheld the order passed by the House Controller. Annexure-3 is the order passed by the Commissioner in the revis
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top