SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Pat) 32

M.P.VARMA, S.ALI AHMAD
Jiba Devi – Appellant
Versus
Satya Nand Roy – Respondent


Judgment

M.P.VARMA, J.

1. This appeal has been referred to a Division Bench by Hon ble Mr. Justice S. Ali Ahmad, who is now a member of the present Division Bench hearing the appeal. The plaintiffs have filed this Second Appeal against the judgements of the courts below.

2. On perusal of the original order, dated 31-1-1969 passed by the Munsif, it appears that the same was passed on a petition framed and preferred under O.22, R.9(2) of the Civil P.C. (hereinafter referred to as the Code) for setting aside the abatement of the main suit. The said suit was for a declaration of title and recovery of possession of some land on the ground that the plaintiffs were dispossessed by the defendants and that the defendants were all members of one joint Hindu family.

3. The trial court took a view that the plaintiffs have failed to establish sufficient cause and has also held that in view the plaintiffs case the suit had abated as a whole and not only against the deceased defendants. An appeal in the court below was preferred as against the order, dated 31-1-1969 and also against the decree dated 19-2-1969, which followed as a consequence to the dismissal of the suit ordered by the original cou












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top