PATNA HIGH COURT
Shivanugrah Narain, J.
Maya Raman
Versus
State Of Bihar
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3966 of 1981 ;
Decided On : APRIL 28, 1983
BIHAR NON-GOVERNMENT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (TAKING OVER OF CONTROL) ACT, 1976 - SECTION 4(2) - APPOINTMENT OF UNTRAINED TEACHERS - VALIDITY - SERVICES OF UNTRAINED TEACHERS APPOINTED PRIOR TO TAKEOVER OF SCHOOL DEEMED TO BE TRANSFERRED TO STATE GOVERNMENT - ENTITLED TO SAME REMUNERATION AND TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE AS BEFORE TAKEOVER - ORDER DIRECTING CANCELLATION OF ADMISSION OF UNTRAINED TEACHER TO PRIMARY TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE QUASHED.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, an untrained Matriculate, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in a non-Government Elementary School on 2-1-1972. The School was taken over by the State Government on 20-4-1977. The petitioner's services were not recognized by the State Government on the ground that she was an untrained teacher appointed after 1-1-1971 in contravention of Government orders. The petitioner challenged the order of non-recognition of her services and the order directing cancellation of her admission to a Primary Teachers Training College.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the order of non-recognition of the petitioner's services was illegal. The Court held that Section 4(2) of the Bihar Non-Government Elementary Schools (Taking Over of Control) Act, 1976 provides that the services of even untrained teachers appointed by the Managing Committee prior to the takeover of the School are deemed to be transferred to the State Government and they become teachers of the State Government and are entitled to the same remuneration which would have been payable to them if the School had not been taken over, if they were on the date of the takeover teachers of the School. The Court further held that the order directing cancellation of the petitioner's admission to the Primary Teachers Training College was also illegal.
Issues: Whether the services of an untrained teacher appointed prior to the takeover of a non-Government Elementary School by the State Government can be recognized.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the services of an untrained teacher appointed prior to the takeover of a non-Government Elementary School by the State Government can be recognized. The Court held that Section 4(2) of the Bihar Non-Government Elementary Schools (Taking Over of Control) Act, 1976 provides that the services of even untrained teachers appointed by the Managing Committee prior to the takeover of the School are deemed to be transferred to the State Government and they become teachers of the State Government and are entitled to the same remuneration which would have been payable to them if the School had not been taken over, if they were on the date of the takeover teachers of the School.
Final Decision: The Court allowed the petition, quashed the order of non-recognition of the petitioner's services, and directed that the petitioner shall be deemed to be an Assistant Teacher of the School and would be entitled to salary at a scale prescribed for untrained Matriculate from the date of takeover of the School. The Court further directed that the respondents shall make arrangements for the admission of the petitioner in some Primary Teachers Training College so that she may get an opportunity to become a trained Matriculate.
1. This application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is directed against the order dated 14-4-1978, issued under the signature of the Sub-Divisional Education Officer, Chapra, copy whereof is Annexure 8 to the writ application, stating that the services of the petitioner Smt. Maya Raman, an untrained teacher could not be recognised by the Government, as she had been appointed after 1-1-1971. By this application, the petitioner further prays for quashing the order, copy whereof is Annexure 12 to the writ application, by which the District Superintendent of Education, Saran directed the Principal of the Primary Teachers Training College, Sonepur, to cancel the admission of the petitioner to the said College.
2. The relevant facts are not in dispute. The petitioner, an untrained Matriculate, was appointed an Assistant teacher of Baljyoti Sansthan Middle School, Chapra, hereinafter called the School, by the Managing Committee of the said School with effect from 2-1-1972. That school was a recognised and aided School. In accordance with the procedure prescribed, the School was taken over by the State Government with effect from 20-4-1977. The order had been issued by the Regional Deputy Director of Education concerned and though the order for taking over was once cancelled by the State Government, the order for cancellation was quashed vide order of the court dated 7-11-1979 passed in C. W. J. C. No. 3315 of 1975. It is not in dispute that the petitioner was serving as a teacher of the School on the date of the take over and, according to the charge report submitted by the Deputy Inspector of Schools, who took over charge of the School, there were three posts and the petitioner was shown at serial 2 in the list of teachers. The petitioner was paid her salary till 31-1-1978, but payment of her salary was stopped thereafter. That fact is stated in paragraph 7 of the writ petition and has not been denied in the counter-affidavit and, therefore, must be taken to have been admitted. It is not also in dispute that by order of the District Superintendent of Education, Saran (respondent No. 5), the petitioner had been deputed for training at the Primary Teachers Training College, Sonepur, which deputation was recalled by the order contained in annexure 12.
3. According to the petitioner, the impugned order refusing to recognise the services of the petitioner as Assistant teacher of the School contravenes Sec.4 of the Bihar Non-Government Elementary Schools (Taking Over of Control) Act, 1976, hereinafter called the Act, and that under Sec. 4 (2) of the Act, the services of the petitioner must be deemed to have been transferred and the petitioner must be deemed to have become a teacher of the State Government and entitled to hold office on the same remuneration and terms and conditions of service as she would have been entitled, to before the taking over of the School and that the State Government could not refuse to recognise her services merely because she was an untrained teacher. No cause has been shown on behalf of the State and its officers who are respondents 1 to 5. According to them, by a letter dated 31-7-1969 of the Secretary of the Education Department addressed to the Director of Public Instruction, the Government of Bihar had ordered that no untrained teacher be appointed in any non-Government Elementary School without the permission of the Additional Director of Public Instruction-cum-Joint Secretary to the State Government, and by a subsequent order contained in the letter dated 26-51975, copy whereof is annexure 7 to the writ petition, Government had laid down that the services of untrained teachers regularly appointed by the managing committees of Primary Schools should be recognised only if they had been appointed till 1-1-1971 and that services of teachers who had been appointed in contravention of Government instructions on a date subsequent to 1-1-1971 should be terminated at once. The 1975 Order f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.