SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Pat) 131

B.P.GRIYAGHEY, BIRENDRA PRASAD SINHA
Maulvi Reza Ansari And Others. – Appellant
Versus
Shyamlal Sah And Others. – Respondent


Judgment

BIRENDRA PRASAD SINHA, J.

1. Both these appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.

2. The question for consideration is whether a Mutawalli of a Wakf estate can institute and defend suits and proceedings in a court of law relating to wakfs after coming into force of Wakf Act. 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

3. In order to appreciate the question arising in these appeals it will be necessary to give certain facts. One Hazi Tassadduk Hussain created a wakf in June, 1914 in respect, of the suit property which is a pucca house consisting of seven rooms situate in Mohalla Nathnagar of Bhagalpur town. According to the wakf deed he was to act as Mutawalli till his death and after him his wife was to act as such. It was further stipulated that after the death of the wife also the Panches of Nathnagar were to appoint a person as Mutawalli whom they consider proper. Both Tasadduk Hussain and his wife died and after their death Maulvi Abdul Hamid was appointed as Mutawalli and manager, Garib Das. Govind Lal and Shyamlal Sah were in occupation of some of the rooms Of the house in question. A suit was filed by Munshi Abdul Hamid, the elect























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top