LALIT MOHAN SHARMA, J.

1. The petitioners in these four cases have challenged the right of the different Agricultural Produce Market Committees, the respondents to the cases, to demand and collect market fee on Ata, Sujji and Maida under the provisions of the Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1960 and the Rules framed thereunder. The main argument has been addressed on behalf of the petitioners in C.W.J.C. 1660 of 1981 with reference to the paperbook of that case, which has been adopted in the other cases.

2. It has been contended that since Ata. Sujji and Maida have not been legally included in the schedule to the Act and in the list of items notified in accordance with law with reference to the Market Committees the Market Committees have no jurisdiction to direct the petitioners to collect and pay market fee thereon. The petitioners have also taken several other points in support of their case which, in view of my opinion on the above question, are not necessary to be dealt with.

3. For the better regulation of buying and selling agricultural produce and the establishment of markets therefor, the Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets Act (hereinafter referred to as th