SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Pat) 29

KRISHNA BALLABH SINHA, HARI LAL AGRAWAL
R. B. Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Hari Lal Agrawal, J.

1. This application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for quashing the order of the Consolidation Officer, Dumraon, dated 18-10-1978 (Annexure 7) passed in Consolidation Case No. 38 of 1978, affirmed on appeal by the Deputy Director (respondent No. 3) and in revision by the Director of Consolidation, Bihar (respondent No. 2) by their orders contained in Annexures 8 and 9 respectively.

2. The area involved in this proceeding is about 40 bighas which was sold to the petitioner by respondent No. 5, the father of respondents 6, 7 and 8, namely, Maharaj Kumar Vishwanath Singh of Dumraon, acting as natural guardian of his aforesaid three minor sons, for a sum of Rs. 20,000.00 by a registered sale deed dated 6-5-1959 (Annexure 2). It is this property that the petitioner has lost in the consolidation proceeding.

3. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the proceeding are as follows. Maharaja Keshav Prasad Singh, the Maharaja of Dumraon, bad two sons, namely, Sri Ram Ran Vijay Prasad Singh and Maharaja Kumar Vishwanath Singh, respondent No. 5, Sri Ram Ran Vijay Prasad Singh had only one son, namely, Maharaja Kamal Singh, a





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top