SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Pat) 34

NAGENDRA PRASAD SINGH, ASHWINI KUMAR SINHA
Sardar Jashwant Singh – Appellant
Versus
Darshan Kaur – Respondent


Judgment

Nagendra Prasad Singh, J.

1. This Civil Revision application has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff. What is the scope of Rule 6-A of Order 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which was introduced by the Civil Procedure Code (Amendment) Act, 1976, is the issue involved in this application.

2. The petitioner had filed the title suit in question for a declaration that he has a right to remain over the suit property as a licensee for a period of five years commencing from 29.9.1980 and for a decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendant-opposite party from interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioner. According to the petitioner, he was a month to month tenant of the suit property, later, there was some dispute and ultimately it was agreed that the petitioner shall continue in possession of the same for a period of five years after which he shall vacate the premises in question. According to the petitioner, during the continuance of the said period, the opposite party interfered with the possession of the petitioner which necessitated the filing of the suit in question.

3. The defendant-opposite party appeared in the said suit and filed their written





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top