SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Pat) 314

BIRENDRA PRASAD SINHA, B.P.GRIYAGHEY
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Laxmi Oil Mills – Respondent


Judgment

1. This appeal is directed against an order passed on an application under Or. 9, R. 13, Civil Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as "the Code") by the court below.

2. A money suit was filed by the respondent against the General Manager, Eastern Railway, Calcutta and the General Manager, North Frontier Railway, Maligaon, Calcutta. The said suit was dismissed for default for non-payment of court-fee but was later on restored. It was admitted on 15-4-77 and ex parte decree was passed on 20-7-77. The appellant thereupon filed an application for setting aside the said decree mainly on the ground that notices had not been served upon them. Thereafter a miscellaneous case was registered and the same was dismissed by the court below on 5-4-78.

3. Mr. A.B. Ojha, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the appellant has submitted before us that the procedure laid down under Order 5, Rule 19-A of the Code was not followed in the present case and on that ground alone the ex parte decree should have been set aside by the Court below. Mr. Ojha has drawn our attention to Order No. 13 date 15 (14)-4-77 and order No. 14 dated 2-5-77 of the trial court in miscellaneous case. They read





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top