MADAN MOHAN PRASAD, HARI LAL AGRAWAL
Manohar Singh Sahay – Appellant
Versus
Jogendra Singh Kalra – Respondent
HARI LAL AGRAWAL, J.
1. This application under Sec.115 of the Civil P. C. arising out of an order passed under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act (briefly the Act) by the court below on an application filed by opposite party No. 1. has been referred to the Division Bench by a learned single Judge as some important points of law are involved in this case. The main question of law is as to whether the court exercising powers under Section 8 of the Act could appoint a new arbitrator in place of the named arbitrator in the arbitration clause of the agreement between the parties.
2. The relevant facts are these: According to the case of opposite party No. 1 (being the managing partner of the firm of the petitioner), the petitioner had entered into a contract with M/s. Heavy Engineering Corporation for erection of a steel structure work of about 950 metric tonnes and machinery repairing, and other equipments, for boiler house and Gas producer plant of bio-proximately 1800 metric tonnes. This job was entrusted to opposite party No. 1 under a work order dated 4-2-1971 containing an arbitration clause to the effect that in case of any, dispute between the parties i.e. the petitioner,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.