ASHWINI KUMAR SINHA
Ram Prasad Mahton – Appellant
Versus
Babu Jagoo Mahton – Respondent
Ashwini Kumar Sinha, J.
1. This is defendants (Defts. 1 to 5) application against the order dated 12-12-1979 passed in Title Suit No. 18/40 of 1974, by which the amendment sought by the defendants in their written statement has been refused.
2. The plaintiffs have brought the suit for partition of the properties claiming the same to be their joint family properties along with the defendants. The defendant-petitioners filed written statement, and their case was that there had already been partition of the family properties and thus the suit for partition was not maintainable. Further claim of defendant No. 1 was that some of the properties were self-acquired properties.
3. On 22-9-1979 a petition was filed on behalf of defendants 1 to 16 under Order VI Rule 17 of the Civil P. C. seeking amendment in the written statement on the grounds mentioned therein, The plaintiffs filed a rejoinder and con-tended that the amendments sought for by the defendants were fit to be rejected, The court below only held that the amendments sought for in the petition appeared to be redundant and unnecessary as according to the court below the explanation of the facts need not necessarily be state
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.