SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Pat) 267

ASHWINI KUMAR SINHA
Ram Prasad Mahton – Appellant
Versus
Babu Jagoo Mahton – Respondent


Judgment

Ashwini Kumar Sinha, J.

1. This is defendants (Defts. 1 to 5) application against the order dated 12-12-1979 passed in Title Suit No. 18/40 of 1974, by which the amendment sought by the defendants in their written statement has been refused.

2. The plaintiffs have brought the suit for partition of the properties claiming the same to be their joint family properties along with the defendants. The defendant-petitioners filed written statement, and their case was that there had already been partition of the family properties and thus the suit for partition was not maintainable. Further claim of defendant No. 1 was that some of the properties were self-acquired properties.

3. On 22-9-1979 a petition was filed on behalf of defendants 1 to 16 under Order VI Rule 17 of the Civil P. C. seeking amendment in the written statement on the grounds mentioned therein, The plaintiffs filed a rejoinder and con-tended that the amendments sought for by the defendants were fit to be rejected, The court below only held that the amendments sought for in the petition appeared to be redundant and unnecessary as according to the court below the explanation of the facts need not necessarily be state




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top