SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Pat) 380

NAGENDRA PRASAD SINGH, M.P.VARMA
Shyam Bihari Upadhyay – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

N.P.SINGH, J.

1. The writ application has been filed on behalf of the petitioners for quashing different orders passed by the , consolidation authorities.

2. Registers of lands of the village in question were prepared in accordance with S.9 of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 thereinafter to be referred to as the Act). The registers so prepared along with the statement of principles were published under S.10(1) of the Act. The plots in question were shown to be in possession of Mosst. Bhagjogna Mosst. Bhagjogna had died in the year 1972.

3. Before the Assistant Consolidation Officer objection was filed under sub-sec.(2) of S.10 of the Act by the petitioners. The objection of the petitioners was allowed by an order dated 13-1-1981. Thereafter, respondents 6 to 8, who had not filed any objection under S.10(2) of the Act filed objection before the Consolidation Officer under S.12(2) of the Act. By order dated 12-2-1983 that objection was allowed. The petitioners filed an appeal before the Deputy Director, Consolidation which was dismissed on 31-3-1983. Even the revision filed before the Director, Consolidation was dismissed on 3-3-1













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top