BIRENDRA PRASAD SINHA
Ananda Bazar Patrika Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Biswanath Prasad Maitin – Respondent
1. The short question for consideration in this case is whether the suit filed by the plaintiff-opposite party against defendant-petitioners at Patna shall be governed by S.16(d) or S.20(c) Civil P. C.
2. The plaintiff-opposite party has filed a suit alleging, inter alia, that defendant-petitioners agreed to sell a property situate at Rohni Road, Jasidih in the district of Santhal Parganas and a sum of Rs.2,501 was paid by the plaintiff as part consideration. On 28-3-1980 the petitioners intimated the plaintiff by a letter at his Patna address that the petitioners were unable to proceed with the proposed sale of the above property and enclosed a draft of Rs.2,501/- which had been paid by the plaintiff as part consideration. The agreement to sell was executed at Calcutta where the defendant-petitioners reside and conduct their business. The property is situate at Rohni Road, Jasidih in the district of Santhal Parganas outside the jurisdiction of Patna Court. The plaintiff-opposite party has prayed for a decree for specific performance of the agreement to sell the property situate at Jasidih on payment of balance of the consideration money amounting to Rs.45,874/- to the peti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.