SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Pat) 393

S.K.JHA, UDAY SINHA, S.K.CHOUDHURI
Mosemmat Bibi Sayeeda – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

UDAY SINHA, J.

1. The common question of law falling for consideration in these four applications under Arts.226 and 227 of the Constitution is whether the markets of the petitioners located at Patna, Arrah, Bhagalpur and Piro vested in the State of Bihar consequent upon the vesting of their estates in terms of notification issued under S.3 of the Bihar Land Reforms Act. C.W.J.C. No. 613 of 1968 relates to Patna Market at Patna, C.W.J.C. No. 45 of 1968 relates to Gudari Bazar in the town of Arrah, C.W.J.C. No. 387 of 1968 relates to Hassan Bazar to Piro and C.W.J.C. No. 330 of 1968 relates to Bazar known as Tilak Babu Ka Hat" in the town of Bhagalpur.

2. The markets mentioned above are the main marketing centres in the towns where they are located. By separate notices the proprietors were called upon to handover possession of the markets. The four writ applications will be disposed of by this common judgment. The vires of any provision of the Bihar Land Reforms Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") has not been questioned. The contention urged on behalf of the petitioners shortly put is that the properties of which possession is sought to be taken over by the State are






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top