R.N.PRASAD, NAGENDRA PRASAD SINGH
Jhabarmal Mukim – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
N.P.SINGH and R.N.PRASAD JJ.
1. This writ application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for quashing a notice issued to the petitioner by the Deputy Commissioner, Santhal Parganas, in purported exercise of the powers confirmed on him by Section 6-A of the Essential Commodities Act (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act). The Deputy Commissioner has required the petitioner to show cause as to why the foodgrains mentioned in the said notice be not confiscated in accordance with the provisions of Section 6-A of the Act. A copy of that notice is Annexure 1 to the writ application.
2. Section 6-A of the Act vests powers in the Collector to pass an order confiscating the essential commodity which has been seized, for contravention of an order made under Section 3 of the Act.
3. On behalf of the petitioner it was submitted that an order of confiscation under Section 6-A aforesaid amounts to punishment or penalty, and, as such, any such order can be passed by a Judicial Magistrate and not by an Executive Magistrate, in view of Section 3 (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Code). Section 3 (4) of the Code is as follows :
"(4)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.