SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Pat) 52

S.J.HYDER
Rajendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bahadur Singh – Respondent


Judgment

1. The only question, which has been canvassed at the bar in support of this revision, is that Ss.13 and 14 of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982, hereinafter referred to as the Act are not operative. Special procedure, prescribed under sec. 14 of the Act, for the disposal of suits for eviction on the grounds referred to in cls. (c) and (e) of sub-sec. (1) of S.11 of the Act, it is contended, should not have been invoked by the court below. In order to appreciate the submissions urged on behalf of the applicants, the facts of the case and the salient provisions of law bearing on the questions may be noticed.

2. The applicants are the tenants of a building of which plaintiff-opposite party is the landlord. Plaintiff opposite party filed the suit giving rise to this revision for ejectment of defendants-applicants in the court of Munsif, Hazaribagh. Two grounds were disclosed in the statement of claim filed by plaintiff-opposite party. In the first place it was stated by him that the building in dispute had been let out by him to defendant-applicants for a fixed period of five years which expired on Feb. 17, 1983 and, as such, plaintiff-opposite p


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top