SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Pat) 54

SATYESHWAR ROY, ABHIRAM SINGH
Kanti Modih – Appellant
Versus
Bhagwat Prasad Bhuwalka – Respondent


Judgment

SATYESHWAR ROY, J.

1. In this application the petitioner has prayed for setting aside the order dated 2-9-1978 passed by the Special Subordinate Judge, Ranchi, in Execution Case No. 29 of 1967.

2. The petitioner obtained a money decree against opposite party No. 2. She executed the decree and the same was registered as Execution Case No. 29 of 1967. In that execution case an immovable property was auction-sold and was purchased by the petitioner. Opposite party No. 1, who was not party to the decree, filed an application labelled under O.21, R.58 and S.151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (the Code) in which he stated that he had interest in the property and prayed for dismissing the execution case. While that was pending another application was filed by opposite party No. 1 in which he prayed for allowing some amendments in the application filed earlier by him. The petitioner filed objection to the same. By the impugned order the Court below allowed the prayer of opposite party No. 1 and directed that the application be registered as Miscellaneous case under O.XXI R.90 of the Code. The petitioner has challenged the validity of this order.

3. The case was listed before a lear





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top