SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Pat) 169

UDAY SINHA, NAZIR AHMAD
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Badshah Prasad – Respondent


Judgment

1. In this reference under Sec.256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called "the Act"), the following question of law has been referred to for our opinion :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner had no jurisdiction to levy penalties in those cases in view of the amended provisions of Sections 274 and 275 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which came into force with effect from April 1, 1971 ?"

2. The assessee was assessed in the capacity of an individual. The assessment years in this consolidated reference are 1967-68 and 1968-69. The assessee is a contractor executing contracts in the Division of Koshi Project. The original assessments for the above two years were completed on May 30, 1970, on incomes of Rs. 4,890 and Rs. 6,940 for the two assessment years respectively. Later, the Income-tax Officer came to learn that the assessee had not disclosed certain payments received by him during the relevant years. A proceeding under Section 147 of the Act was, therefore, initiated. In the course of the said proceeding, the Income-tax Officer initiated proceedings for impositi





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top