SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Pat) 120

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, B.P.JHA
Kishori Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, J.

1. Would the unconditional withdrawal of a writ petition under Art.226 of the Constitution operate as a bar to the filing of a second petition on the same facts and in respect of the same cause of action is the somewhat significant question which arises at the threshold in this appeal under Cl.10 of the Letters Patent.

2. Because of the pristinely legal nature "of the question aforesaid and the view I am inclined to take thereon, it seems wholly unnecessary to recount the facts in any great detail. Suffices it to mention that the issue arises from a somewhat insignificant dispute about the transfer of the appellant and the contending claims to officiate on the post of a Headmaster between him and the contesting respondent. It seems to be common ground that earlier the appellant had preferred Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4505 of 1982 in the High Court for challenging the identical impugned order which was, however, unconditionally withdrawn on 2-12-1982. Thereafter he preferred yet another Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4875 of 1982. This came up before the learned single Judge and he recorded the following order :

"13.12.82- It appears that the pet














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top