SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Pat) 122

PATNA HIGH COURT
Uday Sinha and Satya Brata Sanyal JJ.
Anjuman Ahle Hadees, Darbhanga
Versus
State Of Bihar
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1692 of 1982 ;
Decided On : APRIL 9, 1985

Headnote:Bihar State Madarsa Education Board Act - Sec 7(2)(a) & (b) - Constitution of India Art 30 - Provision for grant in aid to a Madarsa and power of withdrawal recognition to a Madarsa are essential to regulate the affairs of the institution and are constitutionally valid - The state of the agency or the State must have power to regulate he affairs of a recognized institution - The power of inspection & supervision does not take away the autonomy of the institution. (Para. 4 & 5)

       Sec 7(2)(n) - Constitution of the Managing Committee - Act providing the modallty of the constitution not hit by Art 30(1) of the Constitution - State granting financial assistance must have the power to control but the power to manage its affairs can not be swamped - The provision regarding the pattern of the constitution of the managing committee by which the management goes out of the bands of the donors (the minorities) violates Art 30(1) - Power of dissolution also violates- In the grab of regulation the autonomy cant be taken away.

       (Relied on AIR 1963 S.C. 540, AIR 1970 S.C. 2079, AIR 1974 S.C. 1389; AIR 1975 S.C. 1821 distinguished.)

       Per Sanyal, J - State is not competent to impose restrictions while providing grants in aid or extending recognition. (Para 19)

       Sec 25 & 26 - Power to frame rule regarding appointment and promotion of teachers - If it does not curtail the autonomy it is not violative of Art 30(1) (Para 9 & 10)

       Sec 24 - Control over the services and teacher & non-teaching Staff of the Madarsa by the Board amounts to abrogation of power of the Managing Committee and regulating its autonomy similarly the power of the Board to approve the dismissal or discharge of the teachers encroaches upon the autonomy. (Paras 11, 12, & 13)

Judgment

UDAY SINHA, J.

1. By this application under Arts.226 and 227 of the Constitution the petitioners have challenged the Constitutional vires of the provisions contained in Ss.7(2)(a) and (b), (n), 24, 25, 26(2)(c) and (k) and 28 of the Bihar State Madarsa Education Board Act.

2. Petitioner No. 1 is an Association which runs a Madarsa in the town of Darbhanga. Petitioners Nos. 2 and 3 are the members of the Managing Committee of the said Association.

3. The Bihar State Madarsa Education Board Act (hereinafter referred to as the Madarsa Act) was preceded by the Bihar Ordinance 172 of 1981. The Ordinance gave place to the Act without any change. Madarsa Act is an Act to provide for the constitution of an Autonomous Board for development and better supervision of Madarsa education in the State. It would not be inapt to state that in a Madarsa, education and religion are intermixed. There is a sizable population of Muslims in the State. Madarsas being centres of Muslim education and the State being a secular State, the Madarsas also claimed State patronage like other educational institutions. The Madarsas being primarily Muslim minority institutions, they have a right to manage their own concern. The State, did not refuse to extend its patronage to them. Grants-in-aid, were, therefore, accorded to Madarsas as well. In course of time Madarsas also started becoming commercialised. In the name of education funds began to get diverted by pseudo organisations. The need was, therefore, felt to watch the Madarsas consistent with the freedom of the minority to manage their own affairs. That necessitated the enactment of the Madarsa Act. The Act provides for setting up of a Board known as The Bihar State Madarsa Education Board with perpetual succession and common seal. The Board consists of the following members :

(1) Chairman, appointed by the State Government.

(2) Director of Education (Incharge of oriental Education, Bihar).

(3) Director, Institute of Post-graduate studies and Research in Arabic and Persian.

(4) The Principal, Madarsa Islamia Shamshul Huda Patna.

(5) Chairman, Bihar Sunni Wakf Board, Patna.

(6) Chairman, Bihar Shia Wakf Board, Patna.

(7) Two members of the State legislature nominated by the State Government having interest in Madarsa Education or Islamic Studies.

(8) Two senior teachers of recognised Madarsa nominated by State Government.

(9) Three other members nominated by the State Government who have interest in Madarsa Education or Islamic Studies.

The Board has been charged with the duty of providing for instruction and research in Arabic, Persian and Islamic Studies and to advise the State Government on all matters relating to Madarsa Education. The questions raised in this application have to be considered in that background.

4. In order to appreciate the submissions urged on behalf of the petitioners it would be useful to set out herein the provisions under challenge, so far as they are relevant. S.7 of the Madarsa Act lays down the powers and functions of the Board. S.7(2)(a)(b) and (n) which are under challenge read as follows :

"(2) Subject to the provisions of this Ordinance and the Rules and Regulations made thereunder, the Board shall have the powers to direct, supervise and control Madarsa Education and in particular have the powers - (a) To grant recognition to Madarsa in accordance with such regulations as may be made by the Board in this behalf.

(b) To withdraw recognition of a recognised Madarsa in accordance with such regulations as may be made by the Board in this behalf and not to give grant to such Madarsa from the Madarsa Education Fund.

(c) To get the Managing Committee of Madarsa constituted in a manner so as to include the head maulvi, two donor representatives, one teacher representative, two guardians representatives and one member nominated by the Board and two other persons interested in Madarsa Education or Islamic Studies co-opted by the above seven members.

The power to dissolve t



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top