SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Pat) 345

NAZIR AHMAD, UDAY SINHA
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
S. P. Viz Construction Co. – Respondent


Judgment

1. This is a reference under Sec.256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). The questions, referred to us, for our opinion, are as follows :

"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that the first return filed on May 31, 1972, was a valid return though it was not accompanied by the statement of accounts supporting the income shown in the return ?

2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that an application for extension of time made on September 30, 1971, but received in the Income-tax Office on October 1, 1971, could be considered in deciding the question of reasonableness for the delay in filing of the return ?"

2. In this reference, we are concerned with the assessment year 1971-72. The due date for filing the return was October 30, 1971. Application for extension of time to file the return was filed on October 1, 1971. Although the application bears the date September 30, 1971, the finding is that it had been filed on October 1, 1971. A return for the relevant assessment year was filed on May 31, 1972, showing an income o




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top