SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Pat) 135

ANAND PRASAD SINHA, PHANI BHUSHAN PRASAD
Abdul Qadir – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

ANAND PRASAD SINHA, J.

1. Appellant Abdul Quadir has been found guilty for the offence punishable under S. 302 of the Penal Code and appellants Ataullah and Md Mazlum have been found guilty for the offence punishable under S. 302 read with S. 34 of the Penal Code and each has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. All the appellants have been found guilty for the offence "punishable under Ss.147 and 379 of the Penal Code and each has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year under each count. Appellants Lal Mohammed, Neyamat Main, Makul and Ali Hassan have further been found guilty for the offence punishable under S. 323 of the Penal Code and each has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. However, the sentences have been ordered to run concurrently.

2. The prosecution case, briefly stated, is that at about 9 A.M. on 24-7-1972 Md. Usman (P. W. 8), who is also the informant of this case and who happened to be the son of deceased Chuman Mian resident of village Chakla Nirmali, P. S. Supaul, was ploughing his field which was situated towards south of the village. Chuman was, at that time, standing on a ridge. Suleman (P.W. 7)




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top