SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Pat) 187

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, SUSHIL K.JHA
Raghubar Dayal Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Ramekbal Sah – Respondent


Judgment

SUSHIL KUMAR JHA, J.

1. This appeal has been placed before a Division Bench for testing the correctness of a decision of a learned single Judge in the case of Ramchandra Sah V/s. Chotam Sah 1971 BLJR 186. The fate of this appeal hinges on a pure question of law. But before I take up the question of law for determination, the relevant facts first.

2. The plaintiff in the action is the appellant here having come up against a judgment of reversal. The suit was decreed by the trial court. On appeal by the defendant-respondent the plaintiff-appellant lost in the court of appeal below and the suit was dismissed. The facts no longer in controversy and based either on the admitted case of the parties or on concurrent findings of fact of both the courts below, may conveniently be culled here.

3. The plaintiff-appellant instituted the suit for realisation of arrears of rent and eviction of the defendant-respondent from the house standing on holding Nos. 195 and 196 (new) ward No.2 circle No.10 situate in mohalla Sahebganj within the municipal limits of Chapra. The appellant claimed to be the owner of the land in question along with the house as it fell to his share on partition of th


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top