SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Pat) 121

S.ALI AHMAD
Rabindra Nath – Appellant
Versus
G. M. N. F. Rly. – Respondent


Judgment

1. This second appeal arises out of a suit filed by the plaintiff-appellant for a declaration that the order dated 8-1-1964 passed by defendant No. 2 dismissing the plaintiff from service with effect from 15-1-1964 is illegal, void and without jurisdiction. Another prayer that has been made is that the order dated 3-2-1964 passed by defendant No. 1 dismissing the departmental appeal was also illegal and without jurisdiction.

2. Admittedly the plaintiff was an employee of N.F. Railway and was posted at Katihar. A departmental enquiry was initiated against him by an order dated 25th September, 1962. The allegation was that by introducing himself as a clerk of Katihar district office the plaintiff got encashed some bogus substitute salary bills. On that account, it was said that the plaintiff had defrauded the railway administration. A departmental enquiry was conducted in which the plaintiff was found guilty. A second show cause notice was, therefore, given to him to explain as to why he should not be dismissed from service. The plaintiff-appellant submitted his explanation but the same was not accepted and the plaintiff was dismissed by order dated 8-1-1964 passed by defenda





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top